Wednesday, 09 May 2012

  • I love it when people fuck with the stories I know

    There is definitely a place for creating versions of existing stories that are (generally) faithful to the original. While there are always issues in conversion from one format to another, the basic storyline is generally the same in the film versions of The Lord Of The Rings as it is in the books*, and that's a good thing, because if you're only going to get one version of a treasured book then it's nice that they don't completely Dark-Is-Rising it up.

    However, when it comes to superhero movies, there is a definite limit to the number of times that I can maintain any kind of emotional interest in watching Bruce Wayne's parents being killed in front of him. Show me multiple variations on the same movie, and eventually I will get very bored with it. The sheer fact that every movie maker who takes on a superhero movie decides that they have to do the origin story already bores me to tears - sticking so closely to the origin story that I find myself anticipating the gunshots that inspire a life of Great Responsibility is just taking the piss.

    And so I am delighted to watch this latest trailer for The Amazing Spider-Man and discover that I have _no idea_ exactly how it's going to pan out. Sure, the familliar Peter/Gwen/Curt/Ben/May characters are all there, but I'm not convinced they're going to be following the same patterns as usual, the origin story seems to have been tweaked, they're involving different bits to his back story than I'm used to seeing in the movies, and frankly it looks like the plot of a Spider-Man movie is going to interest me for the first time in a long while** 

    *I can hear the naysayers already. Look, I know that Faramir had a personality transplant, and the Ents had to do a double-take for no good reason, but the vast majority of the plot was right there.
    **I'm not a fan of the Sam Raimi movies. The first one was meh, the second was at least watchable, the third was godawful.

Wednesday, 02 May 2012

  • Things don't always go your way

    So many people get college degrees then find employment in a field other than their major. I am a perfect example of that. But it really isn't a bad thing. You should work at something that you enjoy. I really don't advocate borrowing money for education either.

    Got a wake up call this morning at 9:30 that my friend of about 10 years killed himself yesterday. He was brilliant. An engineer like me. We used to cross country ski together, go on bicycle training rides together. Our company just terminated him a week ago. He was very despondent prior to that and was having major issues with management. I don't really think that had a lot to do with it but who knows. Anyway, I don't have any details and I really don't want any either but Brian is gone. So so sad.

Monday, 30 April 2012

Saturday, 21 April 2012

  • Loungerie - To drive her wild

    California in the 1970s has a lot to answer for as well. Is it just me or does no chest hair guy on the right look like Ashton Kutcher? This looks like it was shot during the filming of a porno in some North Hollywood backyard.

    Malibu Sportswear: Lounge Suits, 1979

    So what do you say, ladies? Is it driving you wild? Curling your hair like Farrah's?

    Two more ads for Malibu Sportswear HERE.

Wednesday, 11 April 2012

Tuesday, 10 April 2012

  • Hmm...

    I can feel myself going into my reflective stage where I won't be writing for a little while...strange how that trends and that I am able to actually take notice of it.

    Feel it in my body. Hmmmm....

Sunday, 25 March 2012

  • On the full body scanners now in use in airports

    I don't like 'em. It is basically what we've been joking about for years, become horribly real: the TSA has figured out a way to make all of us fly naked.

    On the plus side, I've been seeing really encouraging conversations about privacy and privilege as a result of these scanners, and I've been seeing them in the "mainstream." This makes me happy.

    But I've seen one common derailing point: whether or not the radiation exposure involved in being scanned is harmful. So I want to clear this up right now.

    The science involved in our understanding of radiation is fairly precise. We know pretty much exactly the exposure involved in being scanned. What we're not sure of is exactly how this dose radiation will affect a person's physiology (this is mostly because the effect is not solely dependent on the physics of the radiation involved). So I can't say "yes it's safe" or "no, it's harmful" because I don't know.

    I can, however, provide some perspective that I think will be helpful.

    The dose of radiation from being scanned is between 0.005 and 0.009 millirems. This figure comes from studies done by experts in the field, not from the information given by the TSA or the company who manufactures the machines (who claim a slightly lower number). Great, so what does that mean?

    0.009 millirems--let's round it up to 0.01--is, in fact, pretty small. During a three hour flight, you will get a dose of about 1 millirem: 100 times more than what you're getting in the scanner. And as someone on twitter pointed out, the difference between living in Atlanta and and living in Denver is about 50 millirems of radiation per year, just because Denver is higher (more cosmic radiation) and there is more uranium in the soil. I am speaking of the same kind of radiation in all of these cases, by the way.

    So to sum up:

    Are the scanners guaranteed safe? I can't say. But I can say that if you're worried about the radiation dose from the scanners, you shouldn't be flying anyway, because the radiation dose you're getting from flying is about a hundred times more than the radiation dose you're getting from being scanned.

    My personal opinion, based on my knowledge of the physics of radiation, is that it's probably safe. We evolved on a planet that has a fairly low level of background radiation of various types, and it pretty much doesn't affect us until it gets way above those levels. These scanners are nowhere near that level. Neither is the radiation you get while flying, so that's okay too.

    My advice is to not use "radiation exposure" as a reason why the scanners are a bad idea. The science is not there to back it up, and it serves for an all-too-convenient derailing point.

Friday, 16 March 2012

  • Color quiz meme

    you are turquoise
    #40E0D0

    Your dominant hues are green and blue. You're smart and you know it, and want to use your power to help people and relate to others. Even though you tend to battle with yourself, you solve other people's conflicts well.

    Your saturation level is higher than average - You know what you want, but sometimes know not to tell everyone. You value accomplishments and know you can get the job done, so don't be afraid to run out and make things happen.

    Your outlook on life is bright. You see good things in situations where others may not be able to, and it frustrates you to see them get down on everything.
    the spacefem.com html color quiz

Sunday, 11 March 2012

Dont_give_a_damn

  • Visit Dont_give_a_damn's Xanga Site
    • Name: Ryu
    • Location: Yerevan, Armenia
    • Member Since: 9/18/2011

Pulse

Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.